Most children have to work hard at being focused and attentive in class, it requires both willpower and determination. Clear rules and boundaries can help many to rein in their distractions, but for some the struggle is complicated by factors outside their conscious control. Punishment or isolation is not likely to help and these students become repeat offenders.
There are some schools that continue to believe that clear rules and boundaries are all that is needed to prompt students to behave. The ability to be compliant and co operative is talked about as if it is a simple expectation. However it is not that simple. Although we all have rational minds, which can be under conscious control, we also have a much larger area of the brain dedicated to keeping us safe and detecting threats. The emotional brain is not under conscious control and is there to detect threats. For many children whose lives have been difficult the emotional brain becomes highly sensitised. The stress response is easily switched on, without the child’s conscious awareness, by any potential threat. This age-old biological safety mechanism in the emotional brain needs to be nurtured and soothed to regain calm. For the emotional brain to be calmed children need a trusted adult to help them co-regulate and calm the stress response. Sending children to detention or putting them in isolation clearly does not meet these needs for support. Children need to know they belong within the school, they need to feel safe, calm and able to focus on learning.
Some schools are hitting the headlines for their tough approach. They make it sound a reasonable proposition which only unreasonable families would challenge. Their formula is this: your child comes to school willing to learn and follow the rules and we keep order by being tough on any disruption which may take teachers away from the curriculum. Like any simple formula it may be too good to be true. However many of these schools are skilful self publicists and repeating the formula gives it a credibility it does not deserve.
Let’s look first at the expectation that character and self control are easily achievable. The self-control paradox is that you can’t consciously exert your will power when the flight or fight response is switched on. You need to feel safe and be calm. You need to be relatively stress free before you can self-regulate. Children from families where poverty or illness is creating toxic long term stress will find it difficult to self-regulate. .
In families where life is tough, switching off the stress response is more difficult. If you arrive in school already predisposed to over react then the added concern that you might break a rule or struggle to keep up with a lesson adds to the stress hidden stresses. A stressed child is more likely to experience the flight or fight reaction once stress reaches a certain level. Once this happens the emotional brain takes over and the cool self talk needed to persuade yourself to make a good decision will elude you.
This can make the school environment feel hostile and threatening if you find the expectations of learning and behaviour hard to meet. Trust and strong nurturing relationships are essential to build a sense of safety and reduce threat. Any withdrawal from classes needs to offer a solution focused approach which identifies personalised strategies to help a student succeed.
Where a school’s discipline strategy is narrow and inflexible offering only time out of lessons it is more likely to escalate alienation and a sense of threat.
These “tough love, no second chances” schools are operating the Matthew Effect in education: “For unto everyone that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance; but from him that hath not shall be taken away” The cumulative effect of deprivation is well known and deliberately setting out to do this is inexcusable.
Some schools believe clear rules and routines are transformational in turning previously unruly classes into safe havens for learning. We are not told about the families who leave or are encouraged to move on because they no longer feel welcome. The blame is shifted onto their shoulders and the school remains confident that they are in the right.
There is an assumption that environment change alone is sufficient to switch on children’s ability to choose to conform and to consciously control their behaviour. However compliance is more likely happen when children feel valued, accepted and made stronger by what the school offers. A child needs to believe they belong are accepted by others and to have the confidence that achievement is possible. Alienation has the opposite effect , creating a sense of failure and rejection making students feel powerless and manipulated.
It is not a simple formula to create a thriving school. Side-lining those who don’t quickly follow the rules is only a temporary solution at best. Schools have a tough job in creating a thriving community. A school’s primary role may be teaching but without considering the welfare and wellbeing of every child this community remains fragile and vulnerable. Every child needs to feel positive and hopeful about their learning.
Where schools rely on tough discipline alone they fail to address the internal dynamic of a thriving community. Thriving communities recognise and explicitly show appreciation of each individual’s contribution. When a school has students who feel excluded or rejected then this can switch on the stress response of flight and fight creating emotional turmoil which is likely to lead to challenging behaviour. Vandalism by pupils is one signal of this alienation.
Calling on self-control alone misses vital steps in the process of developing resilience. Schools need to offer a safe haven to those who are vulnerable and need to explore what it takes to help someone think positively both about themselves and being part of the school. When someone’s sense of self feels diminished by judgemental discussion following an incident then change is unlikely. Criticism is often heard as rejection by those who feel outsiders. A solution focused approach is more likely to lead to constructive steps that will create lasting change.
For young people who are emotionally vulnerable through adverse life circumstances the ability to switch on self control is difficult. They will need support which makes them feel valued and aware that adults are there to help not condemn them. The self-control paradox is that without the sense of acceptance and belonging it is hard to regain the calm that allows us to access the rational thought process which manages self control.

